Since linguistic difference is identified as one of the critical challenges in this context, it may help to explore the possibility of providing language and psychological support in the assessment process. As pointed out in the article, it is sometimes not just a matter of speaking the same language (which can be accomplished by interpreters) but also understanding the unique circumstances of the individual. Essentially, bridging the differences between applicants and members seems to call for blending and balancing linguistic similarity, psychological empathy, and legal objectivity.

This makes me wonder how my own country handles assessment of asylum seekers although I imagine there wouldn’t be as many cases as in Australia.