Comments on: Deep Roots for a Big Linguistics https://languageonthemove.com/deep-roots-for-a-big-linguistics/ Multilingualism, Intercultural communication, Consumerism, Globalization, Gender & Identity, Migration & Social Justice, Language & Tourism Sat, 18 Aug 2012 04:26:30 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9 By: Ingrid Piller https://languageonthemove.com/deep-roots-for-a-big-linguistics/#comment-9475 Thu, 09 Aug 2012 23:32:19 +0000 http://www.languageonthemove.com/?p=11610#comment-9475 In reply to Khan.

Thanks, Khan! We are working on both options 🙂

]]>
By: Khan https://languageonthemove.com/deep-roots-for-a-big-linguistics/#comment-9472 Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:42:28 +0000 http://www.languageonthemove.com/?p=11610#comment-9472 Thanks for sharing the abstract. Very exciting and true picture of the field. Wondering if the talk by Professor Bob Hodge will be broadcasted live?

If the live broadcast is difficult, may I request to make it available in some form after the event.

Khan

]]>
By: Donna Butorac https://languageonthemove.com/deep-roots-for-a-big-linguistics/#comment-9444 Mon, 06 Aug 2012 03:11:30 +0000 http://www.languageonthemove.com/?p=11610#comment-9444 Thank you for this wonderful posting. I have enjoyed reading both accounts of the discussion you had with Ingrid and am very supportive of the call for a spirit of better inclusiveness among linguists. As you suggest, there is so much to be gained. Reading your text also makes me realise the sense of nervous inferiority that I hold when thinking about how my work on language learning and identity might be viewed by a theoretical linguist. How silly, really.

]]>
By: Rosemary Kuwahata https://languageonthemove.com/deep-roots-for-a-big-linguistics/#comment-9294 Sat, 04 Aug 2012 09:40:21 +0000 http://www.languageonthemove.com/?p=11610#comment-9294 The myth of the blind sages who tried to describe an elephant from the one part they touched has always intrigued me, not from the disciplinary aspect but from the perspective of people having different perspectives on, or different understandings of the same thing. I like the idea of Big Linguistics in the sense that you have depicted.

]]>